Speed Cameras - A Necessary Evil Or No Good to Mankind?

In October 2008 Swindon announced that theyawareness of the danger of going too fast. Instead
would be scrapping the fixed point speed camerasthe cameras have bred a feeling of animosity in the
that previously caught speeding motorists in overmotoring community, and have alienated the public
eighty different locations. The controversial move hasagainst road safety efforts. Drivers feel as though
sparked debate across the country, with somethe government is trying to 'catch them out' in order
decrying the decision and others applauding it. Byto make money rather than help them to reduce
November 2008 it was reported that Portsmouth,speed related fatalities. In the end, because the public
Walsall and Birmingham were all considering copyingsees the cameras as 'the enemy', they will never be
Swindon but is banning the speed cameras the righteffective in helping repeat offenders see the error of
thing to do? Nobody likes them, but let's have a looktheir ways.
at some of the arguments surrounding the issue.The fear of being caught:
Statistics:It's true that most people who know that there is a
2002 saw the introduction of Safety Cameras in thecamera will slow down for the camera and speed up
Swindon, and according to statistics the numbers ofafterwards, but what if a driver is on an unfamiliar
road-related fatalities has fallen noticeably since then.road? The warning sign for a speed camera is often
The number of people killed or seriously injured onenough to make people check their speed and slow
the county's roads fell by 5% and for children itdown regardless of whether there is actually a
reduced by as much as 33%; so is this a direct resultcamera or not. Although not as preferable as people
of the cameras? Statistics again would say not; therekeeping to the speed limit of their own accord, the
were seventy fatalities on Swindon's streets infact that drivers are frightened to speed on roads
2007-08 and that seems to be proof that speedthat might have a camera is a lesser evil than
cameras did not make the roads safer.speeding and causing an accident. By removing the
Money:cameras Swindon is removing the 'fear', and might
The money from fined motorists caught speedingend up seeing a lot more speed limits broken than
goes directly to the HM Treasury; neither the policethey anticipate.
nor local councils profit from the cameras, yet itUltimately we have to face the fact that speed
costs a council like Portsmouth £380,000 acameras will not stop crashes completely ; only we
year of public money for six fixed speed cameras.as the motoring public can do that by facing up to
Swindon has been accused of saving money overour responsibilities and becoming better drivers. As
saving lives, yet if the cameras truly don't workTony Simcock, Folkestone based driving instructor,
surely it's best to stop spending money on them andcommented, "Speed cameras have helped raise the
start spending money on finding other traffic calmingawareness that 'Inappropriate Speed Kills'; however,
measures that do work.unless motorists across the UK begin to drive in a
The motoring public:way that significantly reduces the risks to our
Speed cameras rarely work because speeding driverschildren, to other road users and to themselves, we
simply slow down to pass them and very oftenwill always be faced with government initiatives that
speed back up again afterwards. When they doare blanket measures that appear out of place or
catch someone speeding it is likely that the driverheavy handed." He continues, "I do a lot of driving, I
won't even realise until the fine arrives in the posttry to stick to speed limits, have never been caught
some two weeks after; then because the driver hasspeeding, I am very rarely late for a meeting and
achieved distance from the offense, both literatelyhave never been involved in an injury accident - is
and figuratively, the fine does very little to raisethat coincidence, or good driving?